Most down-ballot elections draw little attention, but not this year when it comes to Washington’s Public Lands Commissioner.

Heading into the November balloting, former Congresswoman Jaime Herrera Beutler, a Republican from southwest Washington, faces Democrat King County Council member Dave Upthegrove, who in the last primary election recount, had a razor-thin edge of 51 votes over Republican Sue Kuehl Pederson.

In July, the Seattle Times reported: “No one person or entity, other than the federal government, has more influence over Washington’s landscape than the state lands commissioner, who presides over about 6 million acres of the state’s forest, range, agricultural, aquatic, and commercial lands—with firefighting responsibilities covering 13 million acres of public and private land.”

The Commissioner of Public Lands manages Washington’s massive Department of Natural Resources.

The most controversial issue is how to manage the state’s forestlands, particularly when it comes to logging and removing wildfire fuels. DNR manages more than 2 million acres of forested state trust lands for long-term timber production, specific habitat objectives, protection of clean, abundant water, and to provide carbon absorption and storage.

Washington has been blessed with vast state-owned forests which are held in trust for schools, universities, counties, and even to fund operations of our state capital in Olympia Congress deeded those lands to Washington when it became a state in 1889.

Trust lands managed by DNR are different than other publicly managed lands because they come with a legal responsibility to earn money for the trusts. Much of that money comes from timber sales, and therein lies the rub.

In July, Upthegrove, whose backers include the Sierra Club, told the Spokesman-Review as commissioner, he would preserve so-called “legacy” forests, which aren’t considered old-growth but are stands of older trees. In other words, those forests would not be harvested nor earn money for the trusts.

In addition, Upthegrove supported efforts to pause local timber sales until the agency develops a policy to protect legacy forests. He would direct DNR to harvest timber on other younger parcels while developing long-term revenue alternatives.

Meanwhile, Herrera Beutler, who represented timber and other natural resource-dependent communities in Congress and is backed by the American Forest Resources Council, has a different view.

According to the Spokesman-Review, she believes managed forests—where some timber is harvested—are healthier forests.

Those healthier forests are cleared of woody debris, which fuel massive wildfires. Managed forests also have vibrant younger trees which convert enormous amounts of CO2 into life-giving oxygen.

Legacy forests, on the other hand, protect older trees, some of which need to be harvested. It is not just a matter of the age of trees, their health must factor in.

For example, Washington’s semiarid forests contain lodgepole pine which, is highly susceptible to tree-suffocating beetles as they grow larger and older. Massive mountain pine beetle pandemics leave thousands of acres of mature gray, bark less trees, which fall, clutter the forest floor, and incinerate.

The way those forests replace themselves, if not logged, requires fire. Lodgepole cones pop open like popcorn in a kettle to sprout new trees. Meanwhile taxpayers foot the bill to fight the conflagrations while valuable wood is destroyed, and we all choke from clouds of dense smoke.

In the end, the election may be a referendum on harvesting itself. Not logging only increases the frequency and intensity of uncontrollable wildfire. That approach is unwise and dangerous.

Don C. Brunell is a business analyst, writer, and retired president of the Association of Washington Business. He now lives in Vancouver, Washington, and can be contacted at theBrunells@msn.com.